Sunday, January 6, 2008

quack quack




How is Rosemary Altea selling her books and making money? check out how she was debunked by Penn and Teller. It is a 2003 video, but still good to keep in mind what she and all other psychics are: charlatans







An excerpt of "Science, the Afterlife & the Meaning of Life" by Michael Shermer (to be found here)

"...Psychic Mediumship and Talking to the Dead

Deepak Chopra recounts his experience of participating in a university study of three psychics who claimed that they could communicate with those who had already “passed over” to the other side. Even though none of the psychics were told that Deepak was present, two of them identified him by name, two of them told him that he wanted to contact his recently deceased father, and one knew his childhood nickname in Hindi. He declared it a genuine experience, even while admitting that he had his doubts, especially since “My ‘father’ knew things I knew, but nothing more.”

That is more skepticism than most people muster, especially in emotion-laden readings that promise people a connection to a lost loved one. How do psychics appear to talk to the dead? I have written about this extensively, but in short, it’s a trick that involves utilizing two techniques:

  1. Cold Reading, where you literally “read” someone “cold,” knowing nothing about them. You ask lots of questions and make numerous statements and see what sticks. “I’m getting a P name. Who is this please?” “He’s showing me something red. What is this please?” And so on. Most statements are wrong. But as B.F. Skinner showed in his experiments on superstitious behavior, subjects only need an occasional reinforcement to be convinced there is a real pattern (slot machines need only pay off infrequently to keep people involved). In an exposé I did on psychic medium John Edward for WABC New York, for example, we counted about one statement per second in the opening minute, as he riffled through names, dates, colors, diseases, conditions, situations, relatives, keepsakes, and the like. It goes so fast that you have to stop tape and go back to catch them all. His hit rate was below 10 percent, but those handful of hits were all his subjects needed to feel that they had made contact with a loved one.
  2. Warm Reading utilizes known principles of psychology that apply to nearly everyone. The British mentalist and magician Ian Rowland’s insightful and encyclopedic book on how to do psychic readings, The Full Facts Book of Cold Reading, provides a list of high probability guesses, including identifying such items found in most homes that are sure to convince the mark that their loved one is in the room: A box of old photographs, some in albums, most not in albums; old medicine or medical supplies out of date; toys, books, mementoes from childhood; jewelry from a deceased family member; pack of cards, maybe a card missing; electronic gadget that no longer works; notepad or message board with missing matching pen; out of date note on fridge or near the phone; books about a hobby no longer pursued; out of date calendar; drawer that is stuck or doesn’t slide properly; keys that you can’t remember what they go to; watch or clock that no longer works. Here are some common peculiarities about people that are bound to give the impression that something paranormal is at work: Scar on knee; the number 2 in the home address; childhood accident involving water; clothing never worn; photos of loved ones in wallet or purse; wore hair long as a child, then shorter haircut; one earring with a missing match, and so forth. Mediums such as James Van Praagh, Sylvia Browne, Rosemary Altea and others on whom I have conducted extensive investigations are also facile at determining the cause of death by focusing either on the chest or head areas, and then exploring whether it was a slow or sudden end. They work their way through the half dozen major causes of death in rapid-fire manner. “He’s telling me there was a pain in the chest.” If they get a positive nod, they continue. “Did he have cancer, please? Because I’m seeing a slow death here.” If they get the nod, they take credit for the hit. If the subject hesitates, they will quickly shift to heart attack. If it is the head, they go for stroke or head injury from an automobile accident or fall.

I played a psychic for a day for a television special and found it remarkably easy to convince my subjects that I was really talking to the dead. Of course, anyone can talk to the dead. The hard part is getting the dead to talk back. Psychic mediums use trickery to give the illusion that the dead are communicating with us, and because people who come to mediums for help are emotionally fragile, they are also vulnerable to such effectual methods..."

Friday, January 4, 2008

Ghosts vs. Parallel Universes


Rosemary Altea is a quack. This is one of the reason why I love internet so much: it exposes and repels all the shit that people such as Ms Altea would like to throw on us. But we KNOW. Not very much actually, but enough to say that apparitional experiences are just fantasy. There is nothing out there. If by any chance you experienced anything psychic, you probably added too much cinnamon in your cookies. It's funny to see how many people and societies are willing to pay for just 1 tiny EVIDENCE of any paranormal event check this link.

Those bozos should either demonstrate their powers before going on, stop their scam or go to jail.

Parallel universes on the other hand are leaving science-fiction domains and breaking into reality....... scary!! ;-) here we are!


James Randi vs Rosemary Altea

part 1



part 2



part 3

Thursday, January 3, 2008

Do camels dream of François Isaac de Rivaz ?



Of course they do... I propose a temporal jump of 201 years, back to 1807: François Isaac de Rivaz is sitting in his office, open windows, breathing pure, CO2-poor air from the swiss alps. He is smiling and eating cheese and chocolates. Today is a great day for him. He thinks about future: “what are people going to do in 201 years?”- he looks at his newly conceived internal combustion engine. He enjoys his new marvellous creation. A car propelled by hydrogen combustion! WOW, "this is so hot!", I am sure, in 50, maximum 100 years everybody will drive light, secure, fast cars driven by hydrogen combustion!". He feels so good. He drinks some wine and eat some more cheese. He starts basking again in his grandeur: "in 200 years I will be so famous, everybody on earth will know my name". He falls asleep but suddenly he is shaken by frightening nightmares. 2 oily-smoky-bloody-gory monsters are now crashing his hydrogen-jewel. Noooo! His beautiful work of art forever destroyed. His oeuvre gone lost. He cannot see anything, there is so much smoke around, but as the monsters turn their back and slowly walk away he can now notice 2 big tattoos on each monster: "Diesel" and "Benz". he wakes up coffing and shivering. But he realizes at once: fortunately this was just a dream.

François Isaac de Rivaz was a swiss engineer. He invented the internal combustion engine in 1806 and later the first car moved by such an engine. He was powering his invention using hydrogen.

interesting links on oil vs renewable energy:

- Winning the Oil Endgame: a great, freely available ebook by Amory Lovins et al.
- A Solar Grand Plan by Ken Zweibel, James Mason and Vasilis Fthenakis published on the January 2008 issue of Scientific American, freely available
- Cleaning the Air and Improving Health with Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Vehicles: a paper published on the prestigious journal Science, freely available upon registration: this paper describe how driving clean cars not only makes you save money but would clean up air, thus lowering Asthma attacks and even saving lifes.

Wednesday, January 2, 2008

Devastating Requiem

Darren Aronofsky's Requiem for a Dream. I experienced very few movies with such a powerful impact like this one. Amazing movie in all of its aspects, incredible direction and acting, fantastic score ( by the Kronos quartet).

From the IMDb a great review:

"Awful and Essential, 25 November 2002
Author: eric226 form Seattle USA

...I wish everyone I care about would see Requiem for a Dream. Not because they will like it, or that it will teach them something they did not already know, but that it's a rare piece of work that will challenge and probably change them. It's a film that has never been made before, with nothing to compare to it - a rarity these days. I often find myself recommending films to people that I am unable to briefly describe. These are usually the most involving and affecting ones. I'd like my family to see this, but can't *recommend* it to them. I've recommended it to two friends, and they both had the same reaction: I am glad I watched it, but I doubt I'll be in the frame of mind to watch it again, knowing what you feel.

As I sat watching the credits roll, I began crying, but I'm still not sure why. Partly in reaction to the devastatingly tragic ending, partly the beauty (yes) of the film, partly my gratitude for good things in my life. I watched it again the same night with my girlfriend, not because I wanted to upset her, but I felt that I had to share it. After the credits rolled, we both were silent for a good ten minutes. I found that I had thoughts I wanted to express, but could find no words. This is one of the few films that are painful to experience, but I feel compelled to share with people I care about. Some others in that short list include The Thin Red Line, Happiness, River's Edge,and The Deer Hunter...

..."Favorite" does not apply to this for me - this isn't about entertainment. One of the most devastating and beautiful experiences I've had watching a film. One of the top five films I've ever seen."


Below you can hear "Lux Aeterna" the leitmotif of Requiem for a Dream, composer Clint Mansell, re-orchestrated by Simone Benyacar, Dan Nielsen, and Veigar Margeirsson for the "Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers" trailer (thanks ananassss111)

Tuesday, January 1, 2008

Philip Dick, Valis and the Internet


Hello there. Pink beam-inspired posts as from today, Januay first 2008. Happy new year to all of you.

A blog dedicated to Philip Kindred Dick and inspired by him. PKD is my favourite hero, almost a prophet. He was a visionary genius and I feel very empathic with him. He was exploring arts, phantasy and religion in a desperate, leonardesque sacrifice. He did it to find some kind of light out there
. This is probably what keeps many of us alive and kickin'.




-VALIS
...Vast Active Living Intelligence System....: A perturbation in the reality field in which a spontaneuos self-monitoring negentropic vortex is formed, tending progressively to subsume and incorporate its environment into arrangements of information. Characterized by quasiconsciousness, purpose, intelligence, growth and an armillary coherence.
Great Soviet Dictionary Sixth Edition, 1992-

Philip Dick (1981) Valis

We are searching by the most powerful and exponential-evolving informational tools around, but the -unnamed- is still out there, hidden as it never was before. Is this the reason why we are getting depressed? Come on, Valis, is hatching! his juvenile name is "Internet".

Let's see:

Valis is:

living system & perturbation in the reality field

described as

1. negentropic vortex
spontaneous
self-monitoring

2. subsuming and incorporating its environment into arrangements of information

characterized by:

- quasiconsciousness
- purpose
- intelligence
- growth
- armillary coherence (this is a bit obscure for me: armillary might mean ring-like coherence, from the latin "armilla":ring)


If you consider the evolutionary path of internet, and try to project its near-future shape, you might notice at least few common points between VALIS and the internet.

A question arising is: is internet a self-monitoring living system?

Cheers!